People of Michigan v. Carlos Chanti Bragg ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    October 28, 2015                                                                                      Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    147978                                                                                                Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                           Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                        Justices
    v                                                                  SC: 147978
    COA: 310200
    Grand Traverse CC:
    12-011354-FC
    CARLOS CHANTI BRAGG,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of October 28, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the September
    12, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in
    People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been
    decided on July 29, 2015, 
    498 Mich. 358
    (2015), the application is again considered.
    Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part
    the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Grand Traverse
    Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different
    sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge. On remand, the trial
    court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court
    determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional
    constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial
    court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the
    unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other
    respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining
    questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    October 28, 2015
    s1019
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 147978

Filed Date: 10/28/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2015