People of Michigan v. Fateen Rohn Muhammad ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    October 30, 2015                                                                                     Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    150119                                                                                            Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    Joan L. Larsen,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                                    Justices
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                 SC: 150119
    COA: 317054
    Ingham CC: 13-000161-FH
    FATEEN ROHN MUHAMMAD,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _____________________________________/
    On October 15, 2015, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to
    appeal the July 29, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the
    application is again considered. MCR 7.305(H)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal,
    we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment and REMAND this case to that court for
    reconsideration. The Court of Appeals erred by applying harmless error analysis without
    first determining whether the trial court’s order dismissing the habitual offender notice
    was erroneous. See MCR 2.613(A) (stating that a judgment or order of the court may not
    be vacated, modified, or otherwise disturbed “unless refusal to take this action appears to
    the court inconsistent with substantial justice”). The prosecutor has conceded that it did
    not timely serve the habitual offender notice under MCL 769.13. On remand, we direct
    the Court of Appeals to determine whether the trial court erred by concluding that the
    proper remedy for the prosecutor’s statutory violation was dismissal of the habitual
    offender notice. See In re Forfeiture of Bail Bond, 
    496 Mich. 320
    (2014).
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    October 30, 2015
    a1027
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 150119

Filed Date: 10/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2015