People of Michigan v. Charles Jerome Douglas ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    October 30, 2015                                                                                     Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    150789                                                                                               Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                          Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 150789
    COA: 315027
    Wayne CC: 12-010051-FH
    CHARLES JEROME DOUGLAS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2014
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral
    argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).
    The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order
    addressing whether People v Lockridge, 
    498 Mich. 358
    (2015), by rendering the
    sentencing guidelines advisory and/or by employing a remedy that does not mandate
    resentencing, affects (1) whether a defendant can be afforded relief for an unpreserved
    meritorious challenge to the scoring of offense variables through a claim of ineffective
    assistance of counsel, see People v Francisco, 
    474 Mich. 82
    , 89 n 8 (2006); and (2) the
    scope of relief, if any, to which a defendant is entitled when the defendant raises a
    meritorious challenge to the scoring of an offense variable, whether preserved or
    unpreserved, and the error changes the applicable guidelines range, whether the
    defendant’s sentence falls within the corrected range or not. See 
    id. at 89-90;
    see also
    People v Kimble, 
    470 Mich. 305
    , 310 (2004). The parties should not submit mere
    restatements of their application papers.
    The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense
    Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
    interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court
    for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    October 30, 2015
    p1027
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 150789

Filed Date: 10/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2015