Pageant Homes Inc v. William E Bradley ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    July 13, 2011                                                                                         Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    142691                                                                                                Michael F. Cavanagh
    Marilyn Kelly
    Stephen J. Markman
    Diane M. Hathaway
    Mary Beth Kelly
    PAGEANT HOMES, INC,                                                                                       Brian K. Zahra,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,                                                                                        Justices
    v                                                                  SC: 142691
    COA: 293359
    Ingham CC: 07-001867-CH
    WILLIAM E. BRADLEY, WILLIAM WILFORD,
    and PATRICIA WILFORD,
    Defendants,
    and
    DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2011
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in
    lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
    The record below reflects that plaintiff Pageant Homes, Inc.’s arguments on appeal
    encompassed the issue of whether its lien was discharged because an affidavit of payment
    was filed under MCL 570.1203(1) [repealed by 
    2010 PA 147
    , now codified at
    MCL 570.1118a(1)]. The Court of Appeals erred in holding otherwise. We note, in this
    regard, that the statutory qualification contained in § 1203(1), “to the extent payments
    have been made,” has been held to protect a property owner only up to the amount of the
    payment. See DLF Trucking, Inc. v Bach, 
    268 Mich App 306
    , 311-312 (2005). We
    REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings not inconsistent with
    this order, and for consideration of the issues raised by the parties but not addressed by
    that court during its initial review of this case.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    July 13, 2011                       _________________________________________
    p0706                                                                Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 142691

Filed Date: 7/13/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014