People of Michigan v. Frederick Lawrence Cunningham ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    November 20, 2013                                                                                    Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Michael F. Cavanagh
    Stephen J. Markman
    147437                                                                                                   Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano,
    Justices
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                 SC: 147437
    COA: 309277
    Allegan CC: 11-017200-FH
    FREDERICK LAWRENCE CUNNINGHAM,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 28, 2013
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall
    include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether People v Sanders, 
    296 Mich App 710
     (2012), and People v Sanders (After Remand), 
    298 Mich App 105
     (2012), correctly
    held that the Legislature’s intent in authorizing an assessment of “[a]ny cost” under MCL
    769.1k(1)(b)(ii) was to adopt a “reasonable flat fee” approach that does not require
    precision, and does not require separately calculating the costs involved in a particular
    case; (2) whether assessments of “court costs” are similar to, or interchangeable with,
    “costs of prosecution”; (3) whether the general principles set out in People v Wallace,
    
    245 Mich 310
     (1929), People v Teasdale, 
    335 Mich 1
     (1952), and People v Dilworth, 
    291 Mich App 399
     (2011), which dealt with statutory costs of prosecution and probation
    costs, have any applicability to an assessment pursuant to MCL 769.1k(1)(b)(ii); and (4)
    whether the Court of Appeals in this case properly applied Sanders to affirm the
    assessment of $1,000 in court costs on the basis that it was reasonably related to the
    $1,238.48 average actual cost per criminal case in Allegan Circuit Court, which included
    overhead costs and indirect expenses.
    The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense
    Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
    interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court
    for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    November 20, 2013
    s1113
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 147437

Filed Date: 11/20/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014