People of Michigan v. Juan Joe Cantu ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    March 27, 2020                                                                                    Bridget M. McCormack,
    Chief Justice
    157714                                                                                                  David F. Viviano,
    Chief Justice Pro Tem
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                     Richard H. Bernstein
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                        Elizabeth T. Clement
    Megan K. Cavanagh,
    Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 157714
    COA: 335696
    Kent CC: 95-003319-FC
    JUAN JOE CANTU,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _____________________________________/
    By order of May 28, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2018
    judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v
    Turner (Docket No. 158068). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on
    January 17, 2020, ___ Mich ___ (2020), the application is again considered and, pursuant
    to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of
    the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court for further
    proceedings not inconsistent with this order. At the resentencing for first-degree murder
    held pursuant to MCL 769.25a and Miller v Alabama, 
    567 U.S. 460
    (2012), the trial court
    had jurisdiction to consider the defendant’s arguments regarding his sentences for
    kidnapping and assault with intent to murder. 
    Turner, supra
    . On remand, the trial court
    shall consider the defendant’s arguments regarding the validity of these sentences and
    exercise its discretion whether to resentence him for those convictions, in particular “if it
    finds that the sentence was based on a legal misconception that the defendant was
    required to serve a mandatory sentence of life without parole on the greater offense.”
    Id. We do
    not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    March 27, 2020
    t0323
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 157714

Filed Date: 3/27/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/28/2020