People of Michigan v. Gerald Magnant ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                       Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    March 18, 2020                                                                 Bridget M. McCormack,
    Chief Justice
    159371                                                                              David F. Viviano,
    Chief Justice Pro Tem
    159373
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                 Elizabeth T. Clement
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                    Megan K. Cavanagh,
    Justices
    v                                                      SC: 159371
    COA: 341627
    Ingham CC: 17-000407-FH
    GERALD MAGNANT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                      SC: 159373
    COA: 341621
    Ingham CC: 17-000406-FH
    JOHN FRANCIS DAVIS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the February 5, 2019
    judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral
    argument on the applications. MCR 7.305(H)(1).
    The appellants shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this
    order addressing: (1) whether MCL 205.428(3) requires proof that the defendants knew
    that they were transporting cigarettes in a manner “contrary to” the Tobacco Products
    Tax Act (TPTA), MCL 205.421 et seq., see generally Rehaif v United States, 588 US
    ___; 
    139 S. Ct. 2191
    (2019); Rambin v Allstate Ins Co, 
    495 Mich. 316
    , 327-328 (2014);
    (2) whether nonsupervisory employees fall within the definition of “transporter” under
    MCL 205.422(y); and (3) if so, whether the TPTA’s definition of “transporter” satisfies
    due process by putting the defendants on fair notice of the conduct that would subject
    them to punishment, see People v Hall, 
    499 Mich. 446
    , 461 (2016). In addition to the
    briefs, the appellants shall electronically file appendices conforming to MCR
    7.312(D)(2). In the briefs, citations to the record must provide the appendix page
    numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief
    within 21 days of being served with the latter of the appellants’ brief. The appellee shall
    2
    also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the
    appendices filed by the appellants. Replies, if any, must be filed by the appellants within
    14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere
    restatements of their application papers.
    The time allowed for oral argument shall be 30 minutes: 15 minutes for
    appellants, to be divided at their discretion, and 15 minutes for appellee. MCR
    7.314(B)(2).
    The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys
    Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
    interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court
    for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. Motions for permission to file briefs amicus
    curiae and briefs amicus curiae regarding these cases should be filed in People v Magnant
    (Docket No. 159371) only and served on the parties in both cases.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    March 18, 2020
    t0311
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 159371

Filed Date: 3/18/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/19/2020