In Re: Discipline of Peter Rinato ( 2015 )

accounting practices and any other issues pertaining to his legal practice; (5) provide quarterly reports to the State Bar regarding his trust account, including but not limited to, copies of his trust account statements; and (6) not be convicted of any crime with the exception of minor traffic infractions that do not involve alcohol or controlled substances. Finally, the agreement requires Rinato to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries, within 90 days after he receives a bill from the State Bar. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the guilty plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1). We hereby impose a six-month-and-one-day suspension to be served concurrently with the six- month suspension imposed in Docket No. 64956. 1 Additionally, if Rinato successfully petitions for reinstatement under SCR 116, he will be on probation for two years and must comply with all of the conditions in the plea agreement, as outlined above. Finally, Rinato shall pay the costs of 1 Rinato currently is suspended for failure to pay his State Bar membership dues. Similar to the suspension imposed in Docket No. 64956, the suspension imposed in this order is separate from and in addition to Rinato's dues suspension: the current suspensions for this matter and Docket No. 64956 shall not begin until Rinato has resolved his dues suspension. See SCR 98(13) (describing procedure for reinstatement after dues suspension). We further note that Rinato has been suspended for failure to comply with continuing legal education requirements, and his right to reinstatement is conditioned upon full compliance with SCR 212(5) and SCR 213. In re Continuing Legal Education, Docket No. 66070 (Order Granting Petition as to Certain Respondent Attorneys, January 29, 2015). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1047A Q/Mia the disciplinary proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries, within 90 days of receipt of the State Bar's bill of costs. See SCR 120. It is so ORDERED. dta,g; , C.J. Hardesty Sear ,J. Parraffuir Gibbons DOUGLAS and SAITTA, JJ., dissenting: We would reject the conditional guilty plea agreement because the agreed-upon discipline is not sufficient. J. Saitta cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Peter M. Rinato C. Stanley Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, U.S. Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A e