Pond & Hasey Co. v. Winslow , 97 Minn. 537 ( 1906 )

PER CURIAM.

The principal question in this ease is whether the findings of the trial court are sustained by the evidence. The ruling excluding certain evidence offered by defendants was not error. The evidence upon the issue whether the purchase of the boiler, the value of which plaintiff seeks to recover, was absolute or conditional, was conflicting, presenting a question of fact for the trial court. The findings are not clearly against the evidence and must be sustained1.

Order affirmed.