eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 Federal Courts
 US Court of Appeals Cases
 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
 2017-10

United States v. Richard Jasso , 699 F. App'x 426 ( 2017 )


Menu:
 
  •      Case: 17-10337      Document: 00514216640         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/30/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
No. 17-10337
Fifth Circuit
FILED
Summary Calendar                         October 30, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                        Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RICHARD JASSO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:16:-CR-12-10
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Richard Jasso appeals the mandatory life sentence imposed after a jury
convicted him of distribution and possession with intent to distribute 50 grams
or more of methamphetamine (meth). He argues that his sentence violates the
Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment
because the sentence is disproportionate to the seriousness of the offense of
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-10337    Document: 00514216640     Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/30/2017
No. 17-10337
conviction. As Jasso raised this constitutional issue below, review is de novo.
United States v. Wallace,
    389 F.3d 483
    , 485 (5th Cir. 2004).
When evaluating an Eighth Amendment proportionality challenge, we
make a threshold comparison between the gravity of the charged offense and
the severity of the sentence. McGruder v. Puckett,
    954 F.2d 313
    , 315-16 (5th
Cir. 1992). We look to Rummel v. Estelle,
    445 U.S. 263
    , 272 (1980), as a
benchmark. See United States v. Gonzales,
    121 F.3d 928
    , 943 (5th Cir. 1997),
abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O’Brien,
    560 U.S. 218 
    (2010).
In light of Jasso’s extensive criminal history, which includes convictions for
felony drug offenses and violent crimes such as aggravated assault with a
deadly weapon, he cannot demonstrate gross disproportionality against the
benchmark in
    Rummel, 445 U.S. at 284-85
    . See Harmelin v. Michigan,
    501 U.S. 957
    , 961, 994-96 (1991); United States v. Cooks,
    52 F.3d 101
    , 105 (5th Cir.
1995). Accordingly, Jasso’s Eighth Amendment challenge does not warrant
relief. See
    McGruder, 954 F.2d at 315-16
    . The judgment of the district court
is AFFIRMED.
2