E&T Ventures, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Euphoria Wellness, Llc) ( 2022 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
E&T VENTURES, LLC, No. 84133
Petitioner,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
FILE
JOANNA KISHNER, DISTRICT FEB 1 0 2022
JUDGE, A. BROWN
UPREME COURT
Respondents,
DEP TY CLERK
and
EUPHORIA WELLNESS, LLC, A
NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition
challenges a district court order setting an evidentiary hearing to determine
discovery sanctions, directing the nonparty who verified interrogatory
responses on behalf of petitioner to appear, and directing counsel for
petitioner to serve the order on the nonparty.
Having considered the petition and supporting documentation,
we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention
is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88
P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the
burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
on 1947A 47/Y.
.61
Z 2-09 s32-
relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in
determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED)
Acz_A velk J.
Hardesty
Stiglich
Herndon
cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge
Law Office of Mitchell Stipp
Jones Lovelock
Eighth District Court Clerk
'In light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied
as moot.
2