Gedney v. Gedney , 117 Fla. 686 ( 1934 )

I think that the decree of the court below should be affirmedin toto and the costs taxed against the appellee. It appears that certain testimony had been taken on a hearing upon a prior petition which is not embraced in this record. Aside from this, the Chancellor had the parties before him in person, and was in a better position to judge of the delicate question of the custody of those children than this Court is.