Suzanne Berger v. Baltimore County, Maryland ( 2023 )

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1752 Doc: 19 Filed: 02/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1752
SUZANNE BERGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00064-LKG)
Submitted: February 21, 2023 Decided: February 23, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Rignal W. Baldwin, V, BALDWIN SERAINA, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellant. Thurman W. Zollicoffer, Jr., Deborah St. Lawrence Thompson, Peter W.
Sheehan, Jr., NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1752 Doc: 19 Filed: 02/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Suzanne Berger appeals the district court’s order granting Baltimore County,
Maryland’s, motion to dismiss Berger’s complaint raising multiple discrimination claims,
brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-
17; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634; and the Maryland
Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t § 20-606(a)(1)(i). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Berger v. Baltimore Cnty., Md., No. 1:22-cv-00064-LKG
(D. Md. June 13, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2