Watson v. State , 792 S.W.2d 13 ( 1990 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Keven Watson, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion'would serve no precedential purpose. 'A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, have been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).