Schlup v. State , 216 S.W.3d 726 ( 2007 )

ORDER

Robert Schlup (“Schlup”) appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. Schlup claims that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the testimony of an expert witness, whose testimony was based, in part, upon the findings of a separate, non-testifying expert. Having fully considered the record on appeal, and finding no prejudice, this court affirms. Rule 84.16(b).