E.T.C. ex rel. S.D.C. v. Y.T.S. , 489 S.W.3d 811 ( 2015 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Y.T.S. appeals the portions of a paternity judgment regarding the trial court’s award of prospective and retroactive child support to be paid by S.D.C. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).