Bashor v. State ( 1991 )


Menu:
  •                                No.    91-097
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
    1991
    HOWARD L. BASHOR,
    Petitioner and Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF MONTANA,
    Respondent and Respondent.
    APPEAL FROM:     District Court of the Ninth Judicial District,
    In and for the County of Toole,
    The Honorable Kenneth R. Wilson, Judge presiding.
    COUNSEL OF RECORD:
    For Appellant:
    Howard L. B                     Lodge, Montana
    For Respondent:
    Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General, Helena, Montana
    Deanne L. Sandholm, Assistant Attorney General,
    Helena, Montana
    Merle J. Raph, Toole County Attorney, Shelby,
    Montana               -
    Submitted on briefs: August 1, 1991
    Justice Terry N. Trieweiler delivered the opinion of the Court.
    Howard L. Bashor appeals the order of the District Court of
    the Ninth Judicial District for Toole County, denying Bashor's
    petition for postconviction relief. We a f f i r m the District Court.
    The sole issue presented for appeal is whether the District
    Court erred in denying appellant's petition.
    Appellant was convicted of deliberate homicide and sentenced
    to the Montana State Prison on September 13, 1978, f o r a term of
    30 years with 10 years suspended.     He appealed his conviction in
    State v. Bashor (l98O), 188 Monk. 397, 
    614 P.2d 470
    , and this Court
    affirmed the conviction.
    Appellant filed a petition for postconviction relief in this
    Court on July 20, 1981.    The petition was denied.   Appellant then
    filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the United States
    District Court and that petition was denied. See, Bashor v. Risley
    (D.Mont 19821, 
    539 F. Supp. 259
    .      Bashor appealed, and the Ninth
    Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the District
    Court. See, Bashor v. Risley (19841, 
    730 F.2d 1228
    , cert. denied,
    
    469 U.S. 838
    .
    Appellant filed a petition for habeas corpus in this Court on
    June 24, 1985.    We denied the petition on the ground that the
    claims could have been raised       in the original petition for
    postconviction relief.      Appellant proceeded to then file civil
    actions against the Board of Pardons and Parole in the United
    States District Court.     These actions were dismissed.
    Appellant then filed a petition for postconviction relief in
    District Court on October 31, 1990, raising the same issues he had
    raised   in his petition     for state habeas corpus relief.                A
    supplemental petition      followed     claiming   that    his    good    time
    allowance had not been correctly calculated. On January 18, 1991,
    the   District   Court   denied   the   claims     in    the   petition    for
    postconviction relief for the reason that they had already been
    considered and dismissed by this Court. The supplemental petition
    was denied on the grounds that the court did not have jurisdiction
    over claims regarding good        time calculations.             This appeal
    followed.     Appellant    does   not    appeal    the    decision   on    the
    supplemental petition.
    As noted by the District Court, the matters raised by the
    appellant in his petition for postconviction relief have been
    previously considered or are procedurally barred.                Appellant's
    first two claims, alleging illegal arrest and illegal search and
    seizure, could have been raised on appellant's 1980 appeal to this
    Court, but were not.      Under the provisions of 5 46-21-105, MCA,
    they were, therefore, waived.      State v. Gorder (1990), 
    243 Mont. 333
    , 
    792 P.2d 370
    .   Appellant is procedurally barred from raising
    those claims in a petition for postconviction relief.
    Appellant's third claim, alleging ineffective assistance of
    counsel, was previously considered and denied in his original 1981
    petition for postconviction relief.         We conclude that the lower
    court properly denied appellant's petition and hereby affirm the
    District Court.
    Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court
    1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as
    precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public document
    with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and by a report of its result
    to Montana Law Week, State Reporter, and West Publishing Company.
    We concur:
    August 20, 1991
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that the following order was sent by United States mail, prepaid, to the
    following named:
    Howard L. Bashor
    700 Conley Lake Rd.
    Deer Lodge, MT 59722
    Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General
    Deanne Sandholm, Asst. Attorney General
    Justice Bldg.
    Helena, MT 59620
    Merle J. Raph
    Toole County Attorney
    P.O. Box 730
    Shelby, MT 59474
    ED SMITH
    CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
    STATE OF MONTANA
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 91-097

Filed Date: 8/20/1991

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014