State v. Waddington , 1998 MT 66N ( 1998 )

96-433
No. 96-433
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
1998 MT 66N
STATE OF MONTANA,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
JOSHUA WADDINGTON,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Third Judicial District,
In and for the County of Powell,
The Honorable Ted L. Mizner, Judge presiding.
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For Appellant:
Wendy Holton, Helena, Montana
For Respondent:
Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, Jennifer Anders,
Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana; Christopher G.
Miller, Powell County Attorney, Deer Lodge, Montana
Submitted on Briefs: January 20, 1998
Decided: March 24, 1998
Filed:
__________________________________________
Clerk
Justice William E. Hunt, Sr., delivered the Opinion of the Court.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/96-433%20Opinion.htm (1 of 3)4/25/2007 9:24:55 AM
96-433
¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1996
Operating Rules, the following decision shall not be cited as precedent but
shall be filed as a public document with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and
shall be reported by case title, Supreme Court cause number, and result to the
State Reporter Publishing Company and to West Group in the quarterly table
of noncitable cases by this Court.
¶2 Joshua Waddington (Appellant) appeals from the June 4, 1996 order
entered by the Third Judicial District Court, Powell County, denying his
motion to correct sentence. We affirm.
¶3 On December 16, 1994, Appellant escaped from the Montana State
Prison (MSP) while assigned to the logging yard located on the MSP complex
200 to 300 yards from the guard station. The logging yard operation is part of
the prison industries program administered by the Department of Corrections
and supervised by officials from MSP.
¶4 On September 1, 1995, Appellant was apprehended in Oregon and
returned to MSP. Appellant was thereafter charged with and pled guilty to
felony escape for which he was sentenced to four additional years of
imprisonment. On February 22, 1996, in response to this Court's decision in
State v. Nelson (1996), 275 Mont. 86, 910 P.2d 247, Appellant filed in District
Court a motion to correct sentence pursuant to § 46-18-117, MCA. That
motion was denied and Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
¶5 On appeal, Appellant argues that his sentence was erroneously based
on felony escape and should be corrected to reflect misdemeanor escape. As
support for his position, Appellant relies on our decision in Nelson where we
held that inmates who had escaped from the privately owned Deer Lodge Golf
Course, and who had been supervised by civilians, were guilty of
misdemeanor escape pursuant to § 45-7-306, MCA (1995). We stated:
At the time of the crime, they [the inmates] were not at any one
of the institutions or facilities listed in the statute [§ 45-7-306(3)(b)(i)],
nor were they "in transit" to or from one of those
institutions or facilities.
The institutions or facilities mentioned in § 45-7-306(3)(b)(i), MCA (1995)
include a state prison, county jail, city jail, halfway house, life skills center,
community corrections facility or program, or supervised release program.
¶6 Nelson is distinguishable from the instant case. The Nelson inmates
escaped from a privately owned facility that was supervised by civilians,
whereas Appellant escaped from a facility located on the MSP complex and
supervised by MSP officials. According to the express language of the statute,
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/96-433%20Opinion.htm (2 of 3)4/25/2007 9:24:55 AM
96-433
Appellant was guilty of felony escape rather than misdemeanor escape. We
hold that the District Court did not err in sentencing Appellant in accordance
to the felony escape statute.
¶7 Affirmed.
/S/ WILLIAM E. HUNT, SR.
We Concur:
/S/ J. A. TURNAGE
/S/ JAMES C. NELSON
/S/ JIM REGNIER
/S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/96-433%20Opinion.htm (3 of 3)4/25/2007 9:24:55 AM