Connick v. Judge ( 1975 )


Menu:
  •                                     No. 1-3075
    LN T?IE SUPKPiMli dOUKT OF THE STATE d l MONTANA
    1975
    ART LONNICK, .IKT W O S a n d
    OD
    iHRIS GARDNER, a s t h e Board
    o f County Commissioners o f
    LE3JIS AND CLARK COUNTY, S t a t e
    o f Montana,
    T H O U S L. J U D G E , Governor af      he S t a t e
    o f Montana,
    Counsel o f Record:
    For P l a i n t i f f s :
    Thomas F. Dowling, GourlCy . I c r u r n e y , H e l e n a , Montra Lid
    L e i f B. E r i c k s o n , Deputy County A t t o r n e y , a r g u e d ,
    Helena, Montana
    Louis F o r s e l l a r g u e d , Helena, Montana
    %or    Defendants :
    Hon. R o b e r t L. Woodahl, A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l , Helena,
    Montana
    % t r i c k E. Melby a r g u e d , Helena, Montana
    Yarry L. H j o r t , Helena, Montana
    Submitted:       July    s, 1975
    Decided :    J r 8 3 agpj
    ki
    5iLed:       LA-
    3 j      k,,k,
    PER CURIAM:
    T h i s i s an o r i g i n a l p r o c e e d i n g w h e r e i n p l a i n t i f f c o u n t y
    commissioners of Lewis and C l a r k County s e e k a d e c l a r a t o r y
    judgment a s t o whether t h e Montana F o r t y - F o u r t h L e g i s l a t i v e
    Assembly l e v i e d a p r o p e r t y t a x f o r t h e y e a r s 1975 and 1976 f o r
    t h e s u p p o r t of t h e U n i v e r s i t y System.          T h i s Court p e r m i t t e d t h e
    f i l i n g o f t h e c o m p l a i n t and o r d e r e d s e r v i c e on t h e Governor,
    S t a t e A u d i t o r , S u p e r i n t e n d e n t of P u b l i c I n s t r u c t i o n and t h e
    Board of Regents.
    The Governor f i l e d an answer.                    The S t a t e A u d i t o r a p p e a r e d
    by b r i e f .       The i s s u e r a i s e d i s whether t h e F o r t y - F o u r t h L e g i s l a -
    t i v e Assembly l e v i e d a p r o p e r t y t a x f o r t h e y e a r s 1975 and
    1976 t o s u p p l y t h e fund from which a p p r o p r i a t i o n s have been
    made.      Does t h e a c t of a p p r o p r i a t i n g money from a s p e c i f i c fund
    a c t a s a levy of a t a x t o c r e a t e t h a t fund?
    The F o r t y - F o u r t h L e g i s l a t u r e i n House B i l l s No. 269 and
    No. 2 7 1 , Laws o f Montana 1975, a p p r o p r i a t e d v a r i o u s sums from
    t h e fund c r e a t e d f o r d e p o s i t of t h e monies c o l l e c t e d by t h e l e v y
    a u t h o r i z e d under s e c t i o n 84-3804, R.C.M.              1947, by name and
    a c c o u n t number a s i l l u s t r a t e d by t h e f o l l o w i n g e x c e r p t from
    House B i l l No. 271:
    " S e c t i o n 11. The f o l l o w i n g moneys a r e a p p r o p r i a t e d
    t o t h e b o a r d of r e g e n t s f o r t h e r e s p e c t i v e u n i v e r s i t y
    system u n i t s f o r t h e biennium e n d i n g June 30, 1977:
    For F i s c a l Year             For F i s c a l Year
    Ending 6130176                   Ending 6/30/77
    'I*   9
    :    ;'c
    "UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA
    "* 9: *
    II
    From t h e earmarked r e v e n u e fund
    02106 U n i v e r s i t y m i l l a g e
    ERA [earmarked r e v e n u e a c c o u n t ] 3,041,786                       3,165,627".
    Funds i n t h e t o t a l sum o f $15,836,528 f o r f i s c a l y e a r s
    1976 and 1977 w e r e a p p r o p r i a t e d from t h i s fund f o r t h e s u p p o r t ,
    maintenance, and o p e r a t i o n of t h e U n i v e r s i t y System.                    The Uni-
    v e r s i t y m i l l a g e earmarked r e v e n u e a c c o u n t was o r i g i n a l l y e s t a b -
    l i s h e d i n 1949 a s d i r e c t e d by t h e laws which preceded s e c t i o n
    84-3804, R.C.M.          1947. (See Chapter 217, Laws of Montana 1947,
    and Chapter 218, Laws of Montana 1957).                          It has been used ex-
    c l u s i v e l y f o r t h e d e p o s i t of t a x r e c e i p t s c o l l e c t e d by t h e levy
    f o r t h e support of t h e U n i v e r s i t y System.            Those a r e t h e only
    monies e v e r d e p o s i t e d i n t h e account and t h a t i s t h e only account
    i n which t h o s e t a x r e c e i p t s have e v e r been d e p o s i t e d .
    The Governor, a s defendant, argues t h e i n t e n t t o levy t h e
    t a x i s c l e a r l y shown by t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n of money from t h e
    account c r e a t e d by t h e t a x , and, e r g o , t h e t a x was l e v i e d .            We
    do n o t a g r e e .
    A r t i c l e V I I I , Section 1, 1972 Montana C o n s t i t u t i o n , s t a t e s :
    "Ta.xes s h a l l be l e v i e d by g e n e r a l laws f o r p u b l i c
    purposes. I I
    A r t i c l e V I I I , S e c t i o n 9, 1972 Montana C o n s t i t u t i o n s t a t e s :
    "Appropriations by t h e l e g i s l a t u r e s h a l l n o t exceed
    a n t i c i p a t e d revenue. 1 I
    I t i s obvious then t h a t s p e c i f i c l e v i e s of t a x e s s h a l l be
    made.      Merely a p p r o p r i a t i n g funds does n o t c o n s t i t u t e a levy of
    taxes.      Otherwise, i f a p p r o p r i a t i o n b i l l s were s e l f - e x e c u t i n g t a x
    l e v i e s , t h e r e would be no purpose i n A r t i c l e V I I I .
    S e c t i o n 84-3804, R.C.M.         1947, provides:
    "Upon t h e approval of t h e e l e c t o r s of t h i s s t a t e ,
    t o be determined by t h e i r v o t e a t t h e g e n e r a l
    e l e c t i o n t o be h e l d i n November of 1968, t h e
    l e g i s l a t i v e assembly s h a l l levy a p r o p e r t y t a x
    of n o t more than s i x (6) m i l l s on t h e t a x a b l e
    v a l u e of a l l r e a l and ' p e r s o n a l p r o p e r t y each
    y e a r f o r t e n (10) y e a r s beginning w i t h t h e
    y e a r 1969. A l l revenue from t h i s p r o p e r t y t a x
    l e v y s h a l l be a p p r o p r i a t e d f o r t h e s u p p o r t ,
    maintenance, and improvement of t h e Montana
    u n i v e r s i t y s y s tern. " (Emphasis s u p p l i e d )    .
    This s e c t i o n , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e referendum approving i t ,
    a u t h o r i z e s t h e l e g i s l a t u r e t o levy a p r o p e r t y tax.   I t does n o t
    c o n s t i t u t e a levy.    The l e g i s l a t u r e under t h i s s e c t i o n may f i x
    t h e r a t e , n o t t o exceed s i x m i l l s .       This r a t e can vary each year
    f o r a p e r i o d of t e n y e a r s .    This a u t h o r i z a t i o n i s a m a t t e r of
    c o n t i n u i n g l e g i s l a t i v e judgment t o be determined by each l e g i s -
    l a t i v e assembly, a s i t deems n e c e s s a r y by means of a levy.                         The
    Forty-Fourth L e g i s l a t i v e Assembly d i d n o t make a l e v y pursuant t o
    this authority.
    P a s t l e g i s l a t i v e assemblies have construed and i n t e r p r e t e d
    s e c t i o n 84-3804 a s a u t h o r i z a t i o n t o levy and f u r n i s h revenue t o be
    a p p r o p r i a t e d f o r support of t h e U n i v e r s i t y System.
    The F o r t y - F i r s t L e g i s l a t i v e Assembly l e v i e d f o r t h e s e
    purposes f o r t h e y e a r s 1969 and 1970 (Ch. 321, Laws of Montana
    1969).      The Forty-Second L e g i s l a t i v e Assembly l e v i e d f o r t h e
    y e a r s 1971 and 1972 (Ch. 170, Laws of Montana 1971).                             The Forty-
    Third L e g i s l a t i v e Assembly l e v i e d f o r t h e y e a r s 1973 and 1974
    (Ch. 478, Laws of Montana 1973).
    Each of t h e s e enactments contained t h i s language:
    "Section 1. The following t a x l e v i e s f o r s t a t e
    purposes a r e hereby made upon a l l p r o p e r t y i n t h e
    s t a t e of Montana, s u b j e c t t o t a x a t i o n     * * *."
    Each enactment i n determining t h e r a t e of l e v y provided:
    11
    For t h e u n i v e r s i t y m i l l a g e fund, t o provide funds
    f o r t h e support of t h e Montana u n i v e r s i t y system, a s
    provided i n Referendum Measure No. 65 and passed by
    v o t e of t h e people a t t h e g e n e r a l e l e c t i o n h e l d
    November 5 , 1968, s i x (6) m i l l s , o r so much t h e r e o f
    a s may be n e c e s s a r y t o r a i s e t h e amount a p p r o p r i a t e d
    by t h e l e g i s l a t i v e assembly from t h e u n i v e r s i t y m i l l a g e
    fund f o r support of t h e u n i t s of t h e Montana u n i v e r s i t y
    system. I I
    Thus, i t i s e v i d e n t t h a t t h e t h r e e l e g i s l a t i v e assemblies
    preceding t h e Forty-Fourth regarded s e c t i o n 84-3804 a s a u t h o r i z a -
    t i o n t o make and s p e c i f y t h e levy f o r u n i v e r s i t y system purposes.
    The f a c t t h a t i n each i n s t a n c e t h e y decided upon a s i x
    m i l l levy o r s o much t h e r e o f a s n e c e s s a r y t o m e e t t h e appropria-
    t i o n , does n o t d e t r a c t from t h e f a c t t h e y a c t e d under t h e a u t h o r -
    i z a t i o n , made t h e l e v y , and s p e c i f i e d t h e r a t e .    Each of t h e s e
    assemblies based on t h e circumstances, could have s p e c i f i e d t h e l e v y
    a t 5 m i l l s , 4 m i l l s , 3 m i l l s , o r even 2 m i l l s .         The p o i n t i s , each
    assembly d i d make t h e determination and d i d s p e c i f y t h e r a t e
    authorized by the referendum and existing law. These enact-
    ments were not ritualistic, were not idle gestures.
    The enactments manifest the legislative construction and
    interpretation of section 84-3804 and Referendum No. 65 that
    this section and referendum are not self-executing, but rather
    constitute authorization to make the designated levy.
    In Swartz v. Berg, 
    147 Mont. 178
    , 181, 
    411 P.2d 736
    , this
    Court said:
    "It is a basic premise of the law of taxation that
    the foundation for levying and assessing a tax
    depends upon the existence of a valid legislative
    act specifically designating the imposition of the
    tax. Nothing is taxable unless clearly authorized
    by statute. State ex rel. Tillman v. District Court,
    
    101 Mont. 176
    , 
    53 P.2d 107
    , 
    103 A.L.R. 376
    ."
    There are valid reasons for requiring formality and
    specific designation of the imposition of a tax.   Under the
    1889 Montana Constitution,and its Article XII, many restric-
    tions were placed upon the power of the legislature as to
    taxation.   Those restrictions were set out in 1896 in State
    v. Camp Sing, 
    18 Mont. 128
    , 139, 140, 
    44 P. 516
    .   The 1972
    Montana Constitution does not expressly set out the same
    restrictions in its Article VIII, but does set out many of them.
    If an appropriation bill could be construed as a levy of
    taxes, these safeguards would be lost.
    To sum it up, the Legislature simply failed to make a
    levy as authorized by section 84-3804 and thus, the appropriation
    is not valid since no revenue was provided.   This Opinion shall
    constitute a declaratory judgment.
    '   Chief ~ h s t i c e
    1       fl    0           lM
    Justices.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13075

Filed Date: 7/23/1975

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014