Lohr ex rel. Lohr v. Rothrock ex rel. Rothrock , 202 N.C. 823 ( 1932 )

Per Curiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendants made a motion in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The motion was granted and in this we think there was error.

We have read with care the evidence of plaintiff and think it sufficient to be submitted to a jury. We will not-set it forth or discuss the law, as the case goes back to be heard before a jury. There must be a

New trial.