State v. . Etheridge , 207 N.C. 801 ( 1935 )


Menu:
  • At the July Term, 1934, of Onslow Superior Court, the defendant herein, Sidney Etheridge, was tried upon indictment charging him, pursuant to conspiracy with another, with the murder of one Mamie Moore, which resulted in a conviction of "First Degree Murder" and sentence of death. From the judgment thus entered, the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and was allowed thirty days to prepare and serve statement of case on appeal, and the solicitor was given fifteen days thereafter to serve exceptions or counter-case, but nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal, and the time for serving statement of case has expired. S. v.Brown, 206 N.C. 747, 175 S.E. 116. No appeal bond was required, as the defendant was granted the privilege of appealing in forma pauperis. S. v.Stafford, 203 N.C. 601, 166 S.E. 734. *Page 802

    The prisoner, having neglected to make out and serve his statement of case on appeal within the time allowed, has lost the right to do so, and the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed (S. v. Johnson, 205 N.C. 610, 172 S.E. 219), but this we do only after an examination of the record to see that no error appears on the face thereof, as the life of the prisoner is involved. S. v. Goldston,201 N.C. 89, 158 S.E. 926.

    No error appears on the face of the record. S. v. Hamlet, 206 N.C. 568,174 S.E. 451; S. v. Edney, 202 N.C. 706, 164 S.E. 23. The time for bringing up the appeal has passed. S. v. Hooker, ante, 648.

    When an appeal is taken in a criminal case and execution of the judgment stayed, as provided by C. S., 4654, it is required of the clerk of the Superior Court that he notify the Attorney-General of the appeal; and, if the statutory time for perfecting the appeal has been extended, this fact should also be brought to his attention. Observance of these requirements would expedite the handling of cases on appeal. S. v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620,161 S.E. 81.

    Appeal dismissed.