Cialino v. Wal-Mart Stores ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • Although I agree with the majority that there was not a strong showing that Wal-Mart engaged in stubborn, unfounded litigiousness, I must respectfully dissent for another reason.

    The Court of Appeals remanded to the Full Commission for consideration of plaintiff's request for attorney fees pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-88.1. However, both parties appealed the case from the Full Commission to the Court of Appeals. I therefore believe it is also incumbent upon the Full Commission to consider whether plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 97-88 and I would award fees pursuant to the latter statutory section for the time and trouble of defending against defendant's appeal to the Court of Appeals.

    This 21st day of April 2002.

    S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

Document Info

Docket Number: I.C. NO. 844075

Judges: <center> OPINION AND AWARD for the Full Commission by RENEE C. RIGGSBEE, Commissioner, and DISSENT by THOMAS J. BOLCH, Commissioner, N.C. Industrial Commission.</center>

Filed Date: 4/22/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/6/2016