Shaw v. State , 2021 ND 78 ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    IN THE OFFICE OF THE
    CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
    APRIL 28, 2021
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    IN THE SUPREME COURT
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    
    2021 ND 78
    Delvin Lamont Shaw,                                 Petitioner and Appellant
    v.
    State of North Dakota,                             Respondent and Appellee
    No. 20200190
    Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central
    Judicial District, the Honorable John A. Thelen, Judge.
    AFFIRMED.
    Per Curiam.
    Delvin L. Shaw, Bismarck, ND, petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
    Carmell F. Mattison, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for
    respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
    Shaw v. State
    No. 20200190
    Per Curiam.
    [¶1] Delvin Lamont Shaw appeals from an order denying his application for
    post-conviction relief. Following a jury trial, Shaw was convicted on charges of
    murder and burglary. Shaw argues the district court erred in denying his
    application for post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance
    of appellate counsel on direct appeal. Shaw contends his appellate counsel was
    ineffective because counsel did not consult with him about the objectives of his
    appeal and failed to raise issues that Shaw preserved at trial. Following a post-
    conviction evidentiary hearing, the court found Shaw failed to demonstrate any
    actual prejudice and therefore failed to satisfy the second prong of the
    Strickland test for ineffective assistance of counsel.
    [¶2] We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous.
    Courts need not address both prongs of the Strickland test for ineffective
    assistance of counsel claims if the matter can be resolved by addressing only
    one prong. Rencountre v. State, 
    2015 ND 62
    , ¶ 7, 
    860 N.W.2d 837
    . The court
    did not err in denying Shaw’s application for post-conviction relief, and we
    summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).
    [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, Acting C.J.
    Daniel J. Crothers
    Lisa Fair McEvers
    Jerod E. Tufte
    Douglas L. Mattson, D.J.
    [¶4] The Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, D.J., sitting in place of Jensen, C.J.,
    disqualified.
    1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20200190

Citation Numbers: 2021 ND 78

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 4/28/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/28/2021