United States v. Aguilar , 83 F. App'x 610 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                         United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 10, 2003
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 03-10194
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JAVIER GUADALUPE AGUILAR,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 4:00-CR-260-6-Y
    --------------------
    Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Javier Guadalupe Aguilar appeals his guilty-plea conviction
    and sentence for conspiracy to distribute more than 100 kilograms
    of marijuana.   Aguilar challenges the constitutionality of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
     and argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in
    Harris v. United States, 
    536 U.S. 545
    , 556 (2002), calls into
    question United States v. Slaughter, 
    238 F.3d 580
     (5th Cir.
    2000), cert. denied, 
    532 U.S. 1045
     (2001), in which this court
    upheld the constitutionality of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    .   In Harris, the
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 03-10194
    -2-
    Supreme Court upheld a federal statute that permitted a judge to
    determine the presence or absence of a factor required for
    determination of the applicable statutory minimum sentence.       
    536 U.S. at 568
    .    In Harris, the Supreme Court did not consider the
    constitutionality of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
     or expressly reject this
    court’s view of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
     in Slaughter.    One panel of this
    court may not overrule the decision of another absent an
    intervening decision to the contrary by the Supreme Court or the
    en banc court.    See Hogue v. Johnson, 
    131 F.3d 466
    , 491 (5th Cir.
    1997).   Because Slaughter has not been overruled and is still
    binding precedent in this circuit, Aguilar’s argument is
    foreclosed.    The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.   The
    Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-10194

Citation Numbers: 83 F. App'x 610

Judges: Davis, Dennis, Emilio, Garza, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 12/10/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2023