State v. Moore , 2005 ND 159 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • Filed 9/27/05 by Clerk of Supreme Court

    IN THE SUPREME COURT

    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

      

      

      

    2005 ND 160

      

      

      

    State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

      

    v.

      

    Paul Dean Oie, Defendant and Appellant

      

      

      

    No. 20050031

      

      

      

    Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard W. Grosz, Judge.

      

    AFFIRMED.

      

    Per Curiam.

      

    Don R. Krassin (submitted on brief), Town Centre Square, 500 Dakota Avenue, Suite 240, Wahpeton, ND 58075-4436, for defendant and appellant.

      

    Ronald W. McBeth (submitted on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Law Enforcement Center, 413 3 rd Avenue N., Wahpeton, ND 58075, for plaintiff and appellee.

    State v. Oie

    No. 20050031

      

    Per Curiam.

    [¶1] Paul Dean Oie appeals from a criminal judgment and commitment sentencing him to fifteen-years imprisonment, five years suspended, for two counts of Gross Sexual Imposition under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03(2)(a).  Oie entered Alford guilty pleas, North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 (1970), on each count but argues that a factual basis was not established for Count Two.  The record reflects the district court made an open court inquiry into the factual basis and additionally supplemented such basis with information contained in the pre-sentence investigation report.  A factual basis is to be established to the district court’s satisfaction, Kaiser v. State , 417 N.W.2d 175, 178 (N.D. 1987), and may be provided by a pre-sentence investigation report.   Froistad v. State , 2002 ND 52, ¶ 23, 641 N.W.2d 86.  The standard of review for withdrawing a guilty plea after sentencing is “abuse of discretion.”   State v. Mortrud , 312 N.W.2d 354, 359 (N.D. 1981).

    [¶2] Concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in accepting the guilty plea and a controlling decision by this Court is dispositive, we summarily affirm the criminal judgment and commitment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

    [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

    Daniel J. Crothers

    Mary Muehlen Maring

    Carol Ronning Kapsner

    Dale V. Sandstrom

Document Info

Docket Number: 20050133

Citation Numbers: 2005 ND 159

Filed Date: 9/27/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/3/2016