State v. Doglod , 2022 ND 162 ( 2022 )

FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
AUGUST 18, 2022
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 162State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Naike Doglod, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20220035
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial
District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie A. Lawyer, State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee;
submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on
brief.
State v. Doglod
No. 20220035
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Naike Doglod appeals a criminal judgment entered after a jury found her
guilty of terrorizing and criminal trespass. She argues the evidence was
insufficient to sustain her convictions. After reviewing the record, sufficient
evidence supports Doglod’s terrorizing and criminal trespass convictions. See
State v. Johnson, 2021 ND 161, ¶ 14, 964 N.W.2d 500 (“We have reviewed the
evidence in a light favorable to the verdict, considered the reasonable
inferences the jury could draw from the evidence, and conclude substantial
evidence was presented to the jury to warrant a conviction.”). We summarily
affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
1