Commonwealth v. Marsh , 149 Pa. 239 ( 1892 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    This was a question of subrogation. The printed evidence occupies over 200 pages, and there are 23 specifications of error. A careful and somwhat painful examination of the case fails to show that the discretion of the court below was not properly exercised.

    The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 201

Citation Numbers: 149 Pa. 239

Judges: Hey, Ick, McCollum, Paxson, Stebbett, Williams

Filed Date: 5/23/1892

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/17/2022