Mark Fam v. Bank of America ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 17-2298
    MARK FAM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    BANK OF AMERICA (USA); GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, a/k/a Ditech
    Financial LLC; DITECH FINANCIAL LLC,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; DANIEL WHITEHEAD;
    ROSENBERG LAW FIRM,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00319-AJT-JFA)
    Submitted: June 29, 2018                                         Decided: July 24, 2018
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed in part, affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mark Fam, Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons
    Corner, Virginia; Andrew Michael Williamson, BLANK ROME LLP, Washington, D.C.,
    for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Mark Fam appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint for
    failure to state a claim. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Fam first challenges the transfer of
    his action from the District Court for the District of Columbia to the District Court for the
    Eastern District of Virginia. However, we do not have jurisdiction to review this transfer
    because Fam failed to challenge the change of venue in the Eastern District of Virginia.
    See Brock v. Entre Comput. Ctrs., Inc., 
    933 F.2d 1253
    , 1257 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly,
    we dismiss Fam’s appeal as to the transfer. With regard to the dismissal of Fam’s claims
    for failure to state a claim, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fam v. Bank of Am.,
    No. 1:17-cv-00319-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va., Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED IN PART;
    AFFIRMED IN PART
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-2298

Filed Date: 7/24/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/24/2018