State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Kishiyama , 293 Neb. 317 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library
    www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/
    04/08/2016 09:05 AM CDT
    - 317 -
    Nebraska A dvance Sheets
    293 Nebraska R eports
    STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. v. KISHIYAMA
    Cite as 
    293 Neb. 317
    State     of    Nebraska ex rel. Counsel for Discipline
    of the      Nebraska Supreme Court, relator,
    v. Joseph A. K ishiyama, respondent.
    ___ N.W.2d ___
    Filed April 8, 2016.     No. S-16-227.
    Original action. Judgment of disbarment.
    Heavican, C.J., Wright, Connolly, Miller-Lerman, Cassel,
    Stacy, and K elch, JJ.
    Per Curiam.
    INTRODUCTION
    This case is before the court on the voluntary surrender of
    license filed by respondent, Joseph A. Kishiyama, on March
    3, 2016. The court accepts respondent’s voluntary surrender of
    his license and enters a judgment of disbarment.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS
    Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the
    State of Nebraska on January 10, 2008. The law firm at
    which respondent had been employed sent a grievance letter
    regarding respondent dated October 2, 2015, to the Counsel
    for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court. The grievance
    letter generally alleged that respondent had mishandled the
    representation of certain clients, including that respondent
    had lied to clients regarding filing certain pleadings, had pro-
    vided clients with false court filings, and had delayed report-
    ing to clients the status of their cases. The grievance letter
    - 318 -
    Nebraska A dvance Sheets
    293 Nebraska R eports
    STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. v. KISHIYAMA
    Cite as 
    293 Neb. 317
    alleged that by his actions, respondent violated several of the
    Nebraska Court Rules of Professional Conduct.
    On March 3, 2016, respondent filed a voluntary surrender
    of license, in which he stated that he knowingly does not chal-
    lenge or contest the truth of the suggested allegations set forth
    in the grievance letter. Respondent further stated that he freely
    and voluntarily waived his right to notice, appearance, or hear-
    ing prior to the entry of an order of disbarment and consented
    to the entry of an immediate order of disbarment.
    ANALYSIS
    Neb. Ct. R. § 3-315 of the disciplinary rules provides in
    pertinent part:
    (A) Once a Grievance, a Complaint, or a Formal
    Charge has been filed, suggested, or indicated against a
    member, the member may voluntarily surrender his or
    her license.
    (1) The voluntary surrender of license shall state in
    writing that the member knowingly admits or knowingly
    does not challenge or contest the truth of the suggested
    or indicated Grievance, Complaint, or Formal Charge
    and waives all proceedings against him or her in connec-
    tion therewith.
    Pursuant to § 3-315 of the disciplinary rules, we find that
    respondent has voluntarily surrendered his license to practice
    law and knowingly does not challenge or contest the truth of
    the suggested allegations made against him. Further, respond­
    ent has waived all proceedings against him in connection
    therewith. We further find that respondent has consented to the
    entry of an order of disbarment.
    CONCLUSION
    Upon due consideration of the court file in this matter, the
    court finds that respondent has stated that he freely, know-
    ingly, and voluntarily admits that he does not contest the sug-
    gested allegations being made against him. The court accepts
    - 319 -
    Nebraska A dvance Sheets
    293 Nebraska R eports
    STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. v. KISHIYAMA
    Cite as 
    293 Neb. 317
    respond­ent’s voluntary surrender of his license to practice
    law, finds that respondent should be disbarred, and hereby
    orders him disbarred from the practice of law in the State of
    Nebraska, effective immediately. Respondent shall forthwith
    comply with all terms of Neb. Ct. R. § 3-316 (rev. 2014) of
    the disciplinary rules, and upon failure to do so, he shall be
    subject to punishment for contempt of this court. Accordingly,
    respondent is directed to pay costs and expenses in accordance
    with Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 7-114 and 7-115 (Reissue 2012) and
    Neb. Ct. R. §§ 3-310(P) (rev. 2014) and 3-323 of the disci-
    plinary rules within 60 days after an order imposing costs and
    expenses, if any, is entered by the court.
    Judgment of disbarment.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: S-16-227

Citation Numbers: 293 Neb. 317

Filed Date: 4/8/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/8/2016