Mays v. Mays , 223 Neb. 123 ( 1986 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    Having reviewed the record de novo, which we are required to do, we find the action of the trial court in its division of both nonmarital and marital assets and the awarding of alimony to be fair and reasonable under the circumstances and not the result of an abuse of discretion. Applegate v. Applegate, 219 Neb. 532, 365 N.W.2d 394 (1985); Rockwood v. Rockwood, 219 Neb. 21, 360 N.W.2d 497 (1985); Guggenmos v. Guggenmos, 218 Neb. 746, 359 N.W.2d 87 (1984); Reuter v. Reuter, 218 Neb. 732, 359 N.W.2d 78 (1984); Van Newkirk v. Van Newkirk, 212 Neb. 730, 325 N.W.2d 832 (1982).

    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

    Affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 85-179

Citation Numbers: 223 Neb. 123, 388 N.W.2d 118

Judges: Boslaugh, Caporale, Grant, Hastings, Krivosha, Shanahan, White

Filed Date: 6/13/1986

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/9/2022