United States v. Marschinke ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    ________________
    No. 00-10917
    Conference Calendar
    ________________
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    PAUL ALLEN MARSCHINKE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ----------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Texas
    USDC No. 3:00-CR-40-1-G
    ------------------------
    October 1, 2001
    ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    IT IS ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is
    GRANTED and the opinion previously filed in this case is
    WITHDRAWN.
    Paul A. Marschinke appeals from his sentence imposed for his
    guilty-plea conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, a
    violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2).    He contends
    that the court erred in increasing his base offense level
    pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2), on the ground that he
    allegedly had prior convictions of at least two “crimes of
    No. 00-10917
    -2–
    violence.”    He maintains that neither his 1992 breaking-and-
    entering conviction in New Mexico nor his 1996 Texas conviction
    of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (“UUMV”) qualified as
    “crimes of violence” under the applicable definition of that term
    in § 4B1.2.
    We recently held that a Texas UUMV conviction categorically
    qualifies as a “crime of violence.”    United States v. Jackson,
    
    220 F.3d 635
    , 639 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
    121 S. Ct. 1640
    (2001).   Moreover, the count of conviction underlying
    Marschinke’s New Mexico breaking-and-entering offense expressly
    charged that Marschinke broke into a private dwelling.    Because
    breaking into a private residence almost always presents a
    “‘substantial risk that force will be used,’” see United States
    v. Claiborne, 
    132 F.3d 253
    , 254 (5th Cir. 1998) (citation
    omitted), the district court properly considered the New Mexico
    conviction to be a “crime of violence.”    See § 4B1.2(a)(2)
    (“crime of violence” includes offenses that “involve[ ] conduct
    that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to
    another”).
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-10917

Filed Date: 10/1/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021