Ramos v. Mgm Grand Hotel, Llc ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • and a finding of a five-percent whole person impairment to his cervical
    spine. At that time, the examining doctor concluded that Ramos had
    reached "maximum medical improvement" and was stable and ratable
    with no basis for apportionment.
    In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the appeals
    officer was correct in his determination that MGM properly denied
    Ramos's request for an impairment award despite Dr. Lovaas's finding of a
    whole person impairment of five percent to his cervical spine.
    "This court, like the district court, reviews an appeals officer's
    decision for clear error or abuse of discretion."      Dickinson v. Am. Med.
    Response, 
    124 Nev. 460
    , 465, 
    186 P.3d 878
    , 882 (2008). Although an
    appeals officer's legal determinations are reviewed de novo, "the appeals
    officer's fact-based legal conclusions are entitled to deference and will not
    be disturbed if they are supported by substantial evidence," which is
    "evidence that a reasonable person could accept as adequately supporting
    a conclusion." Id. at 465-66, 
    186 P.3d at 882
    .
    Pursuant to NRS 616C.490(2), MGM is required to schedule a
    PPD evaluation only if Ramos's treating physician concluded that Ramos
    "   may have suffered a permanent disability and [was] stable and ratable."
    Because Ramos's treating physician discharged him with a finding of no
    ratable impairment, we conclude that MGM was not statutorily required
    to conduct a PPD evaluation under NRS 616C.490(2). Thus, Ramos's
    statutory right to request a PPD evaluation under NRS 616C.100 never
    arose and Dr. Lovaas's PPD evaluation was not warranted.               See NRS
    616C.100(1) ("If an injured employee disagrees with the percentage of
    disability determined by a physician. . . , the injured employee may obtain
    a second determination of the percentage of disability.") (Emphasis added.)
    2
    Accordingly, the appeals officer did not abuse his discretion by upholding
    MGM's denial of Ramos's request for a PPD evaluation.
    Therefore, we ORDER the judgment of the district court
    AFFIRMED.
    J.
    Hardesty
    Parraguirre
    Cherry
    cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
    Persi J. Mishel, Settlement Judge
    Greenman Goldberg Raby & Martinez
    Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 59882

Filed Date: 7/24/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021