Greene (Marshall) v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                       Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion
    by denying the motion. See Crawford, 117 Nev. at 721, 30 P.3d at 1125. 1
    Next, appellant contends that the district court abused its
    discretion at sentencing, resulting in a cruel and unusual sentence,
    because he turned himself in for the crime, indicated remorse, and sought
    to better himself in prison. 2 We disagree. Regardless of its severity, a
    sentence within the statutory limits is not 'cruel and unusual punishment
    unless the statute fixing punishment is unconstitutional or the sentence is
    so unreasonably disproportionate to the offense as to shock the
    conscience." Blume v. State, 
    112 Nev. 472
    , 475, 
    915 P.2d 282
    , 284 (1996)
    (quoting Culverson v. State, 
    95 Nev. 433
    , 435, 
    596 P.2d 220
    , 221-22
    (1979)); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 
    501 U.S. 957
    , 1000-01 (1991)
    (plurality opinion) (explaining that Eighth Amendment does not require
    strict proportionality between crime and sentence; it forbids only an
    extreme sentence that is grossly disproportionate to the crime). Here, the
    sentence imposed is within the parameters provided by the relevant
    statutes, see NRS 193.165; NRS 200.030(4)(b), and appellant does not
    allege that those statutes are unconstitutional. Moreover, the sentence is
    not grossly disproportionate to the crime. Accordingly to appellant, he
    cheated on his girlfriend and she left him. When she returned the next
    'We reject appellant's contention that we should consider claims
    disavowed by counsel at the evidentiary hearing. We note that appellant
    did not testify at the evidentiary hearing and therefore cannot
    demonstrate that his plea was involuntary.
    2Appellant    was sentenced to life imprisonment without the
    possibility of parole and a consecutive term of 8 to 20 years' incarceration.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A     7e4,4
    M
    day to apologize, appellant mercilessly beat her with a belt. The victim
    told appellant she could not breathe and appellant told her he did not care.
    The victim died as a result of internal injuries she sustained in the
    beating. Therefore, we conclude that no relief is warranted on this claim.
    Having considered appellant's contentions and concluded that
    they lack merit, we
    ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
    Gibbons
    J.
    Pickering
    cc:   Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge
    Law Office of Kristina Wildeveld
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (0) 1947A    e
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 66276

Filed Date: 12/18/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2015