Luckett v. Boyd Gaming Corp. C/W 64667/65224 ( 2015 )

 demonstrate the necessary elements of a claim for relief so that the
defending party has adequate notice of the nature of the claim and relief
sought"); see NRS 118A.510 (noting the requirements for a retaliatory
eviction claim); NRCP 9(b) (requiring that claims for fraud must be stated
with particularity); May v. Anderson, 121 Nev. 668, 672, 119 P.3d 1254,
1257 (2005) (stating that an enforceable contract requires an offer and
acceptance, meeting of the minds, and consideration); PETA v. Bobby
Berosini, Ltd., 111 Nev. 615, 630-31, 895 P.2d 1269, 1279 (1995)
(recognizing that to sustain an invasion of privacy, claim a plaintiff must
actually expect solitude or seclusion, and that expectation must be
objectively reasonable); Nelson v. City of Las Vegas, 99 Nev. 548, 555, 665
P.2d 1141, 1145 (1983) (setting forth the required elements for an
intentional infliction of emotional distress claim); Lied v. Clark Cnty., 94
Nev. 275, 279, 579 P.2d 171, 173-74 (1978) (requiring that a property right
must be shown to have been invaded to sustain a trespass action).
We further affirm the district court's grant of attorney fees
and costs to respondent, including those attorney fees awarded on the
basis that appellant failed to appear at multiple hearings on appellant's
own motions. Gunderson v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 130 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 9,
319 P.3d 606, 615 (2014).
It is so ORDERED.
C‘l—ftraffe"m ' j.
Parraguirre
J.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1907A
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge
John Luckett
Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF 3
NEVADA
(0) 1947A ce