In Re: Discipline of Evan Schwab ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                           IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    IN THE MATTER OF DISICIPLINE OF                        No. 70148
    EVAN D. SCHWAB, BAR NO. 10984.
    FOLED
    MAY 1 1 2016
    EK-VNDEMAN
    ckEnActvumemisveauR
    CHIEF DEPptY CrE
    ORDER DECLINING TO IMPOSE TEMPORARY SUSPENSON
    This is a petition under SCR 111 concerning attorney Evan
    Schwab, based on a conviction for one count of driving under the influence,
    a misdemeanor." Because the crime is not one of those specifically
    enumerated in SCR 111(6) as a "serious" crime, temporary suspension and
    referral to the disciplinary board are discretionary with this court. SCR
    111(9).
    The seriousness of drinking and driving cannot be minimized,
    however, first offense driving under the influence is not the type of offense
    for which professional discipline is typically imposed. 2 Geoffrey C.
    Hazard, Jr., W. William Hodes, & Peter R. Jarvis, The Law of Lawyering,
    'According to the petition and supporting documents, Schwab
    pleaded guilty to the DUI charge in 2014 and, after he completed the
    terms and conditions of the sentence, the charge was reduced to reckless
    driving in 2015. Schwab apparently did not notify the State Bar as
    required by SCR 111(2) because he did not realize that reckless driving fell
    within the rule. However, the guilty plea in 2014 constituted a
    "conviction" for purposes of SCR 111, see SCR 111(1), and since the guilty
    plea was to a traffic violation that involved the use of alcohol or a
    controlled substance, Schwab was required by SCR 111(2) to report the
    conviction to the State Bar within 30 days.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) I947A   e                                                                     IL0- 14 -ap
    § 69.04, at 69-13 (4th ed. 2015); In the Matter of Respondent I, 2 Cal. State
    Bar Ct. Rptr. 260, 266 n.6, 272 (Rev. Dept. 1993). Accordingly, having
    considered the petition and supporting documentation, we conclude that
    Schwab's offense does not warrant the imposition of a temporary
    suspension or referral to a disciplinary board at this time.
    It is so ORDERED.
    J.
    Hardesty
    J.
    cc: C. Stanley Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada
    Schwab Law Group
    Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director State Bar of Nevada
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A    e
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 70148

Filed Date: 5/11/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021