In Re: Robert C., a Minor ( 2014 )

 those charges," id. at 846, 673 P.2d at 493-94. The holding in Rueben C.
was dependent on the entry of the guilty plea, not whether the defendant
had been sentenced, and appellant has not cited any authority supporting
such a distinction. Whereas the entry of a guilty plea thereafter precludes
a defendant from raising errors that occurred before entry of the plea,
Webb v. State, 91 Nev. 469, 538 P.2d 164 (1975), the entry of a guilty plea
does not waive the right to appeal, see Franklin v. State, 110 Nev. 750, 877
P.2d 1058 (1994) (identifying claims that may be raised on appeal from a
judgment of conviction based on a guilty plea), overruled on other grounds
by Thomas v. State, 115 Nev. 148, 979 P.2d 222 (1999). Instead, a waiver
of the right to appeal requires a knowing and voluntary waiver of that
right. Cruzado v. State, 110 Nev. 745, 879 P.2d 1195 (1994), overruled on
other grounds by Lee v. State, 115 Nev. 207, 985 P.2d 164 (1999). It
therefore is of no moment that the guilty plea agreement included a
waiver of the right to appeal that did not mention the challenge to the
juvenile proceedings. Because the entry of the guilty plea in the adult
criminal proceedings precludes a challenge to the juvenile proceedings
that resulted in the filing of the adult criminal case, we grant the motion
and
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
, J.
Hardesty
J. 4
Cherry
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A eo
51
- ESEIRA
cc: Hon. William 0. Voy, District Judge, Family Court Division
Clark County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) I94Th