Nicoletti v. Union Railway Co. , 247 A.D. 786 ( 1936 )

Defendant moved at Special Term for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs had not complied with an ex parte order requiring them to furnish security for costs. Said motion was granted, and judgment entered. Judgment and order granting motion to dismiss complaint reversed, without costs, and motion denied. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.