Trice v. States of Georgia , 376 F. App'x 313 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-6337
    RICHARD EDWARD TRICE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    STATES OF GEORGIA,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (4:09-cv-02767-JFA)
    Submitted:   April 22, 2010                 Decided:   April 28, 2010
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard Edward Trice, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Richard Edward Trice, a former state prisoner, seeks
    to   appeal        the     district         court’s        orders       accepting        the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     (2006) petition, and denying reconsideration.                             The
    orders    are    not     appealable    unless       a    circuit    justice      or    judge
    issues a certificate of appealability.                        
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)
    (2006).     A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
    substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)      (2006).           A    prisoner      satisfies       this
    standard    by    demonstrating        that       reasonable     jurists       would    find
    that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district
    court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural
    ruling     by      the      district        court        is     likewise       debatable.
    Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v.
    McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    ,
    683-84    (4th    Cir.    2001).       We    have       independently      reviewed      the
    record    and    conclude       that   Trice       has    not    made    the     requisite
    showing.        Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
    and dismiss the appeal.            We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials       before    the    court      and    argument      would     not    aid    the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-6337

Citation Numbers: 376 F. App'x 313

Filed Date: 4/28/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021