People v. Felix CA6 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Filed 2/8/16 P. v. Felix CA6
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    THE PEOPLE,                                                          H042334
    (Monterey County
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                   Super. Ct. No. SS101586)
    v.
    ENRIQUE FELIX,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Defendant Enrique Feliz appeals following the trial court’s denial of his
    Proposition 47 petition requesting that he be resentenced on his conviction for possession
    of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377) as a misdemeanor. (Pen. Code,
    § 1170.18, subd. (f).) Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying his petition,
    because simple possession of methamphetamine is eligible for resentencing as a
    misdemeanor under Proposition 47. The Attorney General concedes the issue, and
    requests that the judgment be reversed, and the matter remanded to the trial court for
    resentencing.
    STATEMENT OF THE CASE1
    On August 26, 2010, in Monterey County, appellant was charged with possession
    of methamphetamine for sale with a gang enhancement (Health & Saf. Code § 11378;
    1
    The underlying facts are omitted because they are not relevant to the issue on
    appeal, and they are not included in the record before us.
    Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1)), simple possession of methamphetamine (Health &
    Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), and street terrorism (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (a)). The
    information also alleged appellant had two prison priors (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)).
    On June 10, 2011, defendant pleaded guilty to all counts and, as to count 1,
    admitted the criminal street gang and prior prison term allegations. Defendant was
    sentenced to nine years in state prison, execution suspended, and was placed on
    probation.
    On November 7, 2012, the trial court found defendant was in violation of
    probation. Defendant’s probation was terminated, and the trial court ordered defendant to
    serve the suspended nine-year term in state prison.
    On April 10, 2015, defendant filed a petition seeking a reduction of his possession
    of methamphetamine conviction to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 1170.18,
    subdivision (a). The trial court denied defendant’s petition, and he brought this appeal.
    DISCUSSION
    Defendant argues, and the Attorney General concedes that the trial court erred
    when it denied defendant’s petition for resentencing of his conviction for simple
    possession of methamphetamine. We accept the Attorney General’s concession.
    Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (a), added to the Penal Code by
    Proposition 47, states in relevant part: “A person currently serving a sentence for a
    conviction, whether by trial or plea, of a felony or felonies who would have been guilty
    of a misdemeanor under the act that added this section . . . had this act been in effect at
    the time of the offense may petition for a recall of sentence before the trial court that
    entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case to request resentencing in
    accordance with Section[] . . . 11377 of the Health and Safety Code . . . as [that section
    has] been amended . . . by this act.”
    2
    Here, defendant was convicted of simple possession of methamphetamine
    pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 11377. Had Proposition 47 been in effect at
    the time of his conviction, defendant’s violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377
    would have been a misdemeanor. Moreover, Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (g)
    states: “If the application satisfies the criteria in subdivision (f), the court shall designate
    the felony offense or offenses as a misdemeanor.”
    Defendant was eligible for resentencing of his conviction as a misdemeanor under
    Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (a), and the trial court erred in denying his
    petition.
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is reversed and remanded. The trial court is directed to grant
    defendant’s petition under Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (a), and resentence
    defendant for violating Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a), as a
    misdemeanor.
    3
    ______________________________________
    RUSHING, P.J.
    WE CONCUR:
    ____________________________________
    MÁRQUEZ, J.
    ____________________________________
    GROVER, J.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H042334

Filed Date: 2/8/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021