Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company , 113 N.J.L. 399 ( 1934 )

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, JJ. 9.

For reversal — CASE, HETFIELD, WELLS, JJ. 3.