Columbia Ins. Co. v. Artale , 114 N.J. Eq. 268 ( 1933 )

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion below.

We express no opinion upon the propriety of the award to appellant Lieblich, of a lien on the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises, for attorney's services rendered to his co-appellants, Emanuel Artale and Mamie Artale. The latter have not raised the question, and it is therefore not before us.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.