Keegle v. County of Hudson , 102 N.J.L. 219 ( 1925 )


Menu:
  • The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.

    For reversal — None. *Page 220

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 130 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 219

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 10/19/1925

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023