-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — CASE, BODINE, DONGES, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 7.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 4. *Page 276
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 176 A. 332, 114 N.J.L. 275
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 1/10/1935
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023