Central R.R. Co. v. Simandl , 125 N.J. Eq. 91 ( 1939 )

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs in this case, the argument and briefs of counsel, and we concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that a preliminary injunction should issue.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.