-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirm,anee — Teenchaed, Paeker, Lloyd, Case, Botone, Daly, Donges, Yan Buskibk, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 107 N.J.L. 523
Filed Date: 2/2/1931
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/9/2022