Wright v. Stone Harbor Improvement Co. , 69 N.J. Eq. 837 ( 1906 )

Pee Ctjeiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Grey.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill—-,13.

For reversal—None.