Rachels v. Pepoon , 104 N.J.L. 183 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchabd, 'Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Yan Buseiee, McGusisnsroisr, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 10.

For reversal — White, J. 1.