-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 104 N.J.L. 436
Filed Date: 2/7/1928
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2022