Michael Quinn Sullivan v. Texas Ethics Commission ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                               ACCEPTED
    03-17-00392-CV
    21562872
    THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    1/2/2018 4:39 PM
    JEFFREY D. KYLE
    CLERK
    Joseph Nixon
    Akerman LLP
    1300 Post Oak
    FILED   IN Boulevard
    Suite 2500
    3rd COURT OF APPEALS
    Houston,
    AUSTIN,    TEXASTX 77056
    1/2/2018 4:39:29
    T: 713 PM
    623 0887
    January 2, 2018                     JEFFREYF:D.  713 960 1527
    KYLE
    Clerk
    RE:      Sullivan v. Texas Ethic Commission, No. 03-17-00392-CV, in the Court of Appeals for
    the Third Judicial District of Texas, in Austin.
    The Honorable Justices David Puryear,                                                 Via E-filing
    Scott, Field, and Cindy Bourland
    Third Court of Appeals
    P.O. Box 12547
    Austin, Texas 78711-2547
    Appellant’s Response to the Post-Submission Letter Brief of the Texas Ethics Commission
    Dear Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland:
    I.     The Texas Ethics Commission (“TEC”) admits that the exemption contained
    in TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §27.010(a) does not exempt this legal action from a
    motion to dismiss brought pursuant to TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §27.003.
    First, this suit is not an “enforcement action” at all as the TEC has so admitted. RR 3:49;
    RR 3:58.
    Second, the TEC admits in its letter brief it did not vote to initiate a civil “enforcement
    action” as required by TEX. GOV’T CODE § 571.171. Nor did the TEC vote to initiate an
    investigation. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 571.124. This court has jurisdiction only because of a de novo
    review under TEX. GOV’T CODE § 571.133(a) and not because the TEC voted to initiate an
    enforcement action.
    Finally, the matter is not brought in the name of the state by the Attorney General.
    akerman.com
    43724001;1
    II.    The case may not proceed to trial on a notice of appeal and a general denial
    as the only live pleadings.
    The position of the TEC in its letter brief that this case could go to trial with only a notice
    of appeal and a general denial in not legally supportable. Indisputably, the TEC has the burden of
    proof in this case. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 571.133(d) very clearly states, in part:
    “(d)…. The reviewing court shall try all issues of fact and law in
    the manner applicable to the other civil suits in this state but may
    not admit in evidence the fact of prior action by the commission or
    the nature of that action, except to the limited extent necessary to
    show compliance with statutory provisions that vest jurisdiction in
    the court. A party is entitled, on demand, to a jury determination of
    any issue of fact on which a jury determination is available in other
    civil suites in their state.”
    TEX.GOV’T CODE § 571.133(d), therefore, requires, The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
    and Evidence apply to this case. That a case may go to trial with live pleadings of only a notice
    of appeal by a respondent and a general denial by the TEC and be submitted to a jury is
    specifically contradicted by Rules 45, 47, 68, 78, 91, 265, 266 and 269 of the Texas Rules of Civil
    Procedure, at a minimum. Further, a notice of appeal and a general denial as the only live
    pleadings at trial would not give the trial court any basis to admit any evidence, as no evidence
    would have any tendency to make a fact plead more or less probable where there are no operative
    facts plead. TEX. R. CIV. EVID §401 AND 402.
    Respectfully submitted,
    AKERMAN LLP
    By: /s/Joseph M. Nixon
    Joseph M. Nixon
    joe.nixon@akerman.com
    State Bar No. 15244800
    1300 Post Oak Blvd. Suite 2500
    Houston, Texas 77056
    Tel: (713) 623-0887
    Fax: (713) 9630-1527
    43724001;1
    James E. “Trey” Trainor, III
    trey.trainor@akerman.com
    700 Lavaca Street, Suite 1400
    Austin, Texas 78701
    Tel: (512) 623-6700
    Fax: (512)623-6701
    COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT
    MICHAEL QUINN SULLIVAN
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct cope of the foregoing Response to the Post-
    Submission Letter Brief of the Texas Ethics Commission has been electronically filed and served
    on all counsel below on January 2, 2018.
    Eric J. R. Nichols
    enichols@beckredden.com
    Amanda Taylor
    ataylor@beckredden.com
    Amy K. Penn
    apenn@beckredden.com
    BECK REDDEN, LLP
    515 Congress Ave., Suite 1900
    Austin, Texas 78701
    (512) 708-1000
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
    43724001;1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-17-00392-CV

Filed Date: 1/2/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/10/2018