In Re: Rodriguez v. , 69 F. App'x 641 ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6614
In Re: JOSE JUAN RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-900-2)
Submitted: July 8, 2003 Decided: July 24, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Juan Rodriguez, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jose Juan Rodriguez petitions for a writ of mandamus. He seeks
an order to compel the district court to grant a certificate of
appealability or to explain its reasons for failing to do so.
Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a
clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Assn., 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a
drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary
circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S.
394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).
Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re
United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979).
We grant Rodriguez leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but
deny the petition for writ of mandamus, as Rodriquez is not
entitled to the relief sought. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2